by Allie Pizzuto
Low voter turnout in the United States
is a pervasive problem that requires our prompt attention. Citizens of the Unites States have the
privilege to elect the President and members of Congress. This privilege serves as the backbone
of our nation’s representative form of democratic government. If we do not participate in
national elections, then it is more likely than not that our elected officials
will not truly represent a broad cross section of our citizenry. This will adversely impact federal laws
passed in America, and also serve to weaken our national and international
interests. Actively participating
in national elections serves to strengthen the legitimacy of our government,
which is significantly weakened due to low voter turnout.
Historically,
voter turnout has swung like a pendulum over the years, rising and falling from
one national election to another but never rising to levels of turnout
experienced by other Western democracies.
Interestingly, voter turnout in U.S. national elections rose
dramatically over a twelve year period from 1948 to 1960, but systematically
dropped in almost every election afterwards until 1988 when voter turnout
represented not more than fifty percent of the eligible voter pool. Voter turnout has yet again swung
like a pendulum since 1988. For
example, in 1996 voter turnout represented 52.6% of the eligible voter pool and
by 2004 surpassed the 1968 level and grew to a healthier 61%.
Voter
turnout is adversely affected by socio-economic factors such as the income
levels of eligible voters.
Apparently, one study found significant inconsistencies among voter
participation across wage earners, noting that approximately 86% of the
eligible voter pool earning more than $75,000 indicated that they cast their votes
to elect the nation’s president while only 52% of eligible voters earning less
than $15,000 participated in a presidential election. This necessarily demonstrates that America’s political
process is highly influenced by the opinions of our citizens who command a
higher income. Similarly,
perceived differences among eligible voters regarding their ability to effect
change in national policy gives rise to low voter participation and an overall
disengagement from political participation.
In addition
to socio-economic factors, other barriers such as registration issues and
inconvenient election voting schedules (e.g., voting during the workday) gives
rise to low voter turnout. These
barriers inflate the current levels of inequality that already exist in voter
turnout participation among eligible voters in the low to high income
brackets. One solution to increase
voter turnout would be to remove these barriers and significantly lessen the
gap that exists in discrepancies among eligible voters. For example, additional eligible voters
who usually forego voting would probably participate in national elections if
they were able to vote on a weekend (rather than during the workday). Permitting weekend voting would also
increase voter participation by eligible voters attending college on a full or
part time basis.
Although
changes can be made to increase voter participation, motivating voters to
actively participate in national elections and cast their votes is a stumbling
block that is not easily overcome.
One way to instill motivation in eligible voters is to change misguided
perceptions about voting. Voting
is not a passive activity, meaning that we do not simply cast a vote. On the contrary, voting involves our
active participation in understanding the issues and how the issues impact us,
as human beings. Active
participation in the voting process is crucial to maintaining a strong democracy
in America, which we will be unable to maintain over the long term if we
continue to perceive voting as just casting a vote. America’s citizens need to know that their identity and
opinions matter, and that not only is it a privilege to vote and actively
engage in America’s political process and future but it is also our civic duty.