by Eric Wang
In the past four years, Obama’s support rate has dropped significantly.
People seem to have lost the passion and the resolution they had the day Obama
won the presidency. The most important reason of the all is that people didn’t
see the revolutionary change that could solve all the problems and open a new
era as they expected. However, is it not that Obama is incapable of promoting
change, it is because that Obama couldn’t. The campaign between two parties in
expressing their own interests and seeking reelection has always occurred in
U.S. history, but it has become exceedingly furious in the past few years. Every
attempt Obama made has faced great opposition from the Republicans. As the
Democrat Representative Mike Thompson said, it’s like the Republican agenda
became making sure President Obama did not win re-election.
However, Republicans are not the only side who is involved in this
partisan feud. Mike Thompson himself has voted his party’s line 92.2% of the
time, and this is not an extreme example. The average Democrat votes with the
party 93% of the time, while that number for Republicans isn’t much different. Now
the two-party system has already turned away from the intention of the Founders.
The members of Congress usually view the interests of their parties as primary,
instead of representing the interests of citizens. As Joseph Lieberman, who has
represented Connecticut in the Senate for 23 years, said in his speech, “too
often people… who come to government in Washington with the best of intentions
end up putting their parties’ interests ahead of the country’s interests?”
This partisan gridlock does great harm to the current situation,
especially in light of the still-terrible economy status. For U.S economy to
get back in order, long term economic policies are required, which may take
much longer than a presidential term. Both parties must cooperate to get things
done.
Before the 2012 election, the politicians had hoped that the election would
resolve the struggle and end the gridlock. As Representative Paul Ryan said,
one side would gain the moral authority to impose permanent and fundamental
reform. But it didn’t happen this way. After the election, things seem to
remain the same. Democrats have the presidency and Senate, while Republicans
still control the House. However, there is positive side of the election. Obama
will no longer have to seek re-election. The most extreme Republican candidates,
Richard Mourdock and Todd Aiken have lost their previous positions. Obama said
in his acceptance speech, “In the coming weeks and months, I am looking forward
to reaching out and working with the leaders of both parties to meet the
challenges we can only solve together.”
He said that before, but this time it’d better be true. The leaders for
both parties have to understand the reality that they can’t get everything they
want and no one can get everything he/she wants. To fix this broken democratic
system, it will be impossible to pass a new Amendment that changes the form of
politics. Therefore compromise is the only way and the most essential way to
solve the problems such as fiscal cliff, before they are no longer problems,
but disasters.
I absolutely agree. The partisan grid lock is one of the most serious and urgent problems the Congress faces right now. The split between the two parties and the shift of focus is probably the reason why the government are so inffecient to get things done. People forget what they've promised when they are elected into the office. They forget that their only duty is to serve the people and the nation, not seeking benefits for their parrty or blocking out the other party. However, I'm not so optimistic about the upcoming year. It's been an issue for so long that I have no confidence the situation will get any better.
ReplyDelete